Being IML - February 2004

John in Dallas, Texas, January 2004
Enjoying Texan hospitality!

I've spent the last few weeks thinking about the issue of "consent" and what that means when we live out our fantasies. Perhaps it was seeing a couple of leathermen wearing swastikas at a leather party over Christmas that made me question my beliefs, or the recent trial of a cannibal who found a willing victim over the Internet and has now been convicted of manslaughter.

How do we deal with the issue of consent as a community when we all have such wildly different ideas about what is acceptable or offensive behaviour? One person's humorous rape fantasy in a leather contest can bring back memories of actual rape in a member of the audience. Another person's cigar fetish exacerbates someone else's asthma. How can we agree on issues of consent in a public space, like a leather bar, a dungeon, or in the case of the "Chicago Leather Family" anywhere with cocktails and showtunes?

Let's discount some easy answers. I don't think that you should be able to do whatever you want in private as long as all parties consent. From the reports in the press the cannibal killed his victim in private and both parties consented, but what he did was not right.

I also don't think that the only answer is to follow the mantras "Safe, Sane and Consensual" or "Risk Aware Consensual Kink (RACK)". A lot of hard core BDSM players would argue that their edge play isn't entirely safe, sane or consensual. Awareness of the risks and informed consent didn't stop the cannibal from killing his willing victim. And the court's verdict was that he was sane at the time.

Equally though, I am passionate that we shouldn't go for the lowest common denominator and outlaw from our leather spaces anything which is likely to offend. That road leads to a ban on all drinking, smoking, talking, partial nudity, humour, uniforms or any form of sexual expression. (Sounds like that might be California in ten years time!)

There has to be more to the issue of consent than a well-worn phrase or knee-jerk response. In an age of individuality when people vigorously defend the right to live out their own fantasies, is it possible to come up with a set of guidelines that are acceptable to the majority of our community, allowing the edge players freedom to play while reducing the risk of offence to others?

Here are five suggestions (from a variety of sources) for guidelines about where to draw the line in living out fantasies:

These are not meant to be "commandments from IML" but rather starting points for a discussion about what is acceptable. If you come up with some more ideas please let me know.

Have fun, and look after yourselves and the people you play with.

Yours in leather,

John Pendal
International Mr Leather 2003

To my home page To the full index To the next column